As gasoline engines go the Atomic 4 has a flat torque curve.
There are various version of the A4 around, but the common 30 HP
variant had about 35 ft/lbs at 1000 RPM, and "peaks" around
43 ft/lbs. From about 1800 RPM to 3500 RPM it stayed within
about +/- 1.5 ft/lbs.

If you compare the Beta Marine 25 HP diesel ( BD902 ) it has a
similar curve, maybe +/- 2.5 ft/lbs from 1600 to 3600.

Since HP come from torque x RPM the HP curves are similar.

 On a 27 - 32 moderate displacement sailboat the Atomic 4 and
a 1:1 transmission was an adequate match. A target would be to
maintain 70 - 80% of hull speed at around 1800 RPM with some
head wind and seas.  On an A4 that would be around 13 HP. 

Fuel economy? I went by a gas station earlier today. Gas was
$0.81 a litre, diesel was $1.15 a litre. Ouch!

Michael Brown
Windburn
C&C 30-1




Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:18:32 -0600 
From: "Dennis C." <capt...@gmail.com> 
To: Jake Brodersen <captain_j...@cox.net>, CnClist 
     <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ engine size 
Message-ID: 
     <canir+ysq4pdcgevnyemk8274dt44cz2d07_ogpifgons0yq...@mail.gmail.com> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 
 
Josh pretty much restated my argument for repowering from an AT4 to a 
diesel.  My main reasons were flatter torque curve and better  fuel 
economy.  The gasoline flammability issue had very little to do with my 
decision. 
 
Punching into a seaway with an AT4 sucks.  To generate the horsepower, an 
AT4 needs rpm's.  The 1:1 drive just results in making bubbles.  A diesel 
with a flat torque curve, a reduction gear and a big pitched prop takes a 
bigger bite without cavitating.  Blenders are great for frozen drinks but 
not for driving a boat through waves. 
 
The admiral and I spent a couple hours punching dead upwind in a narrow 
channel one day in 3-4 foot seas and mid-teens on the nose.  Sucked. 
Sitting back in Mandeville was a brand new 25 hp diesel and all the parts 
to repower.  We just didn't have time to complete the swap before that trip. 
 
As for the original thread, Yanmar, I think, recommends 1 hp per 500 lbs 
displacement.  I think that's a bit light. 
 
I seem to recall Nigel Calder recommends 1.5 hp per 1000 lbs. 
 
Dennis C. 
Touche' 35-1 #83 
Mandeville, LA 
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album.

Please donate to the C&C Photo Album to keep this list free for all subscribers.

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page 
at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

Reply via email to