Royce Souther wrote:
<snip>
> VMware will build virtual hard drives that are split up in to 2G files.
> This may not help because the drive images must be on a local native
> system.
You do not *have* to do this.  NTFS and ext2/3/4 (as well as most other
file systems supported under Linux such as xfs, jfs, reiser 3/4 etc.)
support file sizes larger than 2G
> 
> My last though is, what kind of idiot designs a NAS to use vfat? Doesn't
> it have a 32G maximum file system limit?
> 
32 GiB is a Microsoft limitation and it is intentional.  Win 9x/me with
an updated checkdsk.exe could support 127 GiB.  In theory fat32 could
support up to 8 TiB but the boot sector uses a 32 bit sector count,
limiting the maximum size to 2 TiB.

I am a big fan of my DNS 323 (I am probably going to get a DNS 343
soon).  It has linux on board which you can extend to support things
like svn, rsync, and ssh (I use those three a lot actually).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to