I see...cool - thanks, Marcus!

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes, you can utilize an iscsi lun as shared mount point. Create a lun,
> make sure your hosts can see it, create a cluster filesystem on it, mount
> it on all hosts, then tell cloudstack about it so it can start creating VM
> disk images on it. But if you're talking about a 1:1 mapping of lun to VM
> disk, and doing it via plugin, you'll probably want to bypass the
> unnecessary cluster fs layer and just use the disks directly.
>
> On Mar 20, 2013 8:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> > Thanks for that info.
> >
> > I am not all that familiar with KVM ... at least yet.  :)  I had thought
> the way one would utilize an iSCSI target in CS today for KVM was via
> Shared Mount Point, but I could certainly be wrong.
> >
> > What are your thoughts on the other points I was making around the
> plug-in?  Was I making sense in general?
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm out of touch on the other technologies, but you probably wouldn't
> use a shared mount point on KVM. You would use the block devices themselves
> as they show up.
> >>
> >> Cluster LVM for KVM, for example, gives cloudstack a pool, where it
> creates virtual block devices, and those are treated like raw disks for the
> VMS to use. I would imagine a SAN storage plugin working nearly the same
> way, just pushing the pool out of the host OS and onto the SAN. Cloudstack
> still creates the volumes (via the plugin), but also does the work of
> connecting the luns to the proper hosts where their VMs will run, using
> them as dedicated block devices.
> >>
> >> Shared mount point would mean that you'd put a cluster filesystem on
> your dedicated lun, mount it, and then create a single flat file on it to
> represent your VM disk.
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2013 7:44 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Some questions have come up recently regarding the 4.2 storage plug-in
> that Edison implemented.
> >>>
> >>> In an attempt to clarify this, I'm sending out this e-mail with my
> understanding of how the new plug-in framework will operate in 4.2.
> >>>
> >>> Hopefully Edison or maybe David Nalley (but anyone else, of course)
> can comment on if this is accurate.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> * The storage vendor creates a storage plug-in.
> >>>
> >>> * Primary Storage can be associated with this plug-in (as opposed to
> being associated with pre-existing storage).
> >>>
> >>> * When a Compute or Disk Offering is executed and it is tagged to use
> Primary Storage that makes use of this plug-in, the plug-in is invoked to
> create the necessary storage (let's say an iSCSI volume).
> >>>
> >>> * A datastore (for VMware) or a storage repository (for XenServer)
> then needs to be created for the SAN volume to be utilized from CS.  I
> suppose a shared mount point would need to be created for KVM.
> >>>
> >>> * The VM or data disk is placed on the datastore or storage repository
> and it (the VM or data disk) is the only object that ever utilizes this
> datastore or storage repository (or shared mount point, for KVM).
> >>>
> >>> The idea behind this being that storage does not have to be set aside
> ahead of time in bulk and that you can map a single VM (or data disk) to a
> single, say, SAN volume.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mike Tutkowski
> >>> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> >>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>> o: 303.746.7302
> >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud™
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Tutkowski
> > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud™
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to