> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:41 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bugs > for 4.1.0! > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 AM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and > >> critical bugs for 4.1.0! > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi > >> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > Chip I think your query for defects is looking at "Affected Version" > >> > as 4.1 rather than "Fix Version" as 4.1 > >> > > >> > I had moved out some of the defects assigned to frank out to 4.2 > >> > since he is > >> on vacation and won't return in time for 4.1. They are still showing > >> up in your list. > >> > > >> > >> How does who they are assigned to affect what version they are tracked > for? > >> If it is a blocker (or critical) it doesn't stop being a blocker or > >> critical because the person assigned is away. I didn't see a vacation > >> notice which would have been nice so that time sensitive bugs could be > reassigned. > >> > >> --David > > > > [Animesh>] If someone else wants to pick up the defects that's fine, but if > there is no else what do you do? Sudha was aware of these getting marked > for 4.2. Next time on we should call these out separately on the list. > > > > Sudha being aware != community being aware (as much as we value her > contributions!). Please let's be sure to remember that we're an OSS project > here. > [Animesh>] It was mentioned by her in comments of one of the bare metal defects. As I said next time on this needs to be called out explicitly.
> As for the bare-metal defects, is there anyone with enough experience > willing to take a stab at the fixes? > > -chip