Sangeetha, Test plan looks good to me. getUser is Admin only API. Thanks, Kishan
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 3:31 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > I have updated the Regions Test Plan to reflect the changes that have been > made to the FS - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Regions+T > est+Plan. > > Please review and provide your feedback. > > -Thanks > Sangeetha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sangeetha Hariharan > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:29 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > Thanks Kishan for your input. > > Since we will now rely on Events Framework feature to publish events that > could be used by admins to maintain data sync between regions , I have > created test plan for this feature- > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Events+Framew > ork+Test+plan . > This test plan addresses only a part of Event Framework feature that is > needed by AWS regions feature for achieving data sync of > Account/Domain/User objects between regions. > Please provide your feedback. > > -Thanks > Sangeetha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:53 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > Please find my response inline. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2013 1:14 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > > > I have updated the test cases according to the latest functional Spec > > which is to make use of Event frameworks instead of api based sync for > > domain/account/users. > > Test cases can be found here - > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Regions+T > > est+Plan . Please provide your feedback. > > > > I had the following questions: > > > > 1. In case of update/delete action from a region that is not the owner > > , API call will succeed as long as it has been able to forward the > > request to owner region and the owner region actually executed the > > command . Even after receiving a success from the API call, the > > changes will not be committed in this region. This seems like a > > confusing experience . Can we expect any message indicating to the user > about the redirection of request? > > > [KK] Forwarding to owner region should be removed. Data sync is external > to CloudStack. > > > 2. In case of deleting domains/accounts from a region that is not the > > owner of this region , this will result in the domain/account being > > actually deleted from the owner region which will also result in all > > the resources like network and Vms being deleted. Is this acceptable? > [KK] When account/domain is deleted all resources will also be deleted. > > > > > 3. Consider the case of domains/accounts (owner Region 1) that have > > users that are owned by 2 different regions , say user1 (owner Region > > 1) and user2 (owner Region2) . Which region is responsible for > > deletion of domain/account , since this deletion will also involve > > deletion of users which are now owned by 2 different regions? > > > [KK] Since data sync is external to CloudStack, we don't need the notion of > owner region. > > > 4. Why is there a need for getUser API ? When will this get used ? > [KK] getUser API is for components like object-store to authenticate and get > account information > > > > 5. Can you include the response parameters for all the new API calls ? > [KK] I've added the response parameters to the spec. > > > > -Thanks > > Sangeetha > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:53 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2013 12:07 PM > > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 26 February 2013 8:22 PM > > > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:34:13PM +0530, Kishan Kavala wrote: > > > > > Removed API based account sync for Regions as discussed earlier [1] . > > > > Event framework will be used instead. I pushed the changes to master. > > > > commit: e37fdce125511535961c77a77d253ce232a954d0. > > > > > I'll be merging the same to 4.1 branch. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack- > > > > dev/2013 > > > > > 02.mbox/%3ccd3462cf.64a2%25chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this something we really want to do now? Has the feature been > > > > QA'ed > > > yet? > > > > This seems pretty late to make a change to the basic function of > > > > the feature for 4.1. > > > > > > > > If my concern are overblown, then say so! > > > > > > > > -chip > > > > > > This commit only removes API based account data sync and it is > > > fairly isolated part of the code. > > > Events are already in place so no changes in that area. > > > > > > > Changes were merged to 4.1 branch. I also changed tabs to spaces in > > the related files, so the diff shows more changes than actual.
