On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:51 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >>>> Well, if we want it someone needs to do it. I'm looking at hadoop (as >>>> David suggested) [snip...] >>> >>> Take a look at Hadoop's contributor guide [1], specifically the >>> "Contributing your work" section. Hadoop is using Jira for patch >>> submissions, a custom jira workflow, and builds.a.o basically does the >>> CI +1 of the patch before a committer reviews and commits it. >>> >>> They basically have the workflow that I proposed... The downside is >>> that Jira attachments are a poor way to do peer reviews. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> >> I thought that was supposed to be the piece that Gerrit solved. >> >> --David >> > > I said "workflow" not tool chain. The point was that they have a > similar process, and a different use of tools to pull it off (than > what we are discussing).
ACK - I missed the wording. --David
