Hi, That is probably true, Wei.
Do you know, though, if that is something we should separate in the GUI because it makes sense to do so from a user's point of view or are we doing it for our own (developer) "convenience?" Thanks! On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike, > > I think it is because the processing of virtual routers (start, > stop,reboot,destroy) are different from SSVM and CPVM. > You can have a look at the source code, such as StartRouterCmd.java and > StartSystemVMCmd.java > > Wei > > > 2013/3/7 Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> > > > Hi, > > > > In the Infrastructure tab of the GUI, I notice both a System VMs and a > > Virtual Routers options (buttons you can click to drill down on the > details > > of these categories). > > > > If I look under System VMs, I see my SSVM and my CPVM, but not my Virtual > > Router. If I look under Virtual Routers, I see that my Virtual Router is > > listed as a system VM. > > > > My question is just the following: Is it on purpose that we do not list > > Virtual Routers under System VMs alongside the SSVM and CPVM? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > o: 303.746.7302 > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *™* > > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*
