Thanks Kawai. Nice patch to retrieve session cookie, I just found this link: http://www.java.net/node/696222, talking about similar issue. But it seems that you found a better way to extract cookie using BrowserCompatSpec. I will apply your patch shortly to master to address the build issue.
-min On 3/5/13 9:54 PM, "KAWAI Hiroaki" <ka...@stratosphere.co.jp> wrote: >Hi, I wrote a patch for this problem, too. >Please see https://reviews.apache.org/r/9768/ > >(2013/03/06 10:28), Min Chen wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> With recent Vmware SDK upgrade in master branch, Chiradeep reported an >>issue with JDK7 that I overlooked during my local testing since my setup >>has JDK 6. We failed to compile vmware-base using JDK 7 due to using >>com.sun.xml.internal.ws.transport.http.client.CookieJar to retrieve >>Cookie set by WS calls. This CookieJar class is present in JDK 6 >>classes.jar, but seems missing from JDK7, causing this compilation >>error. This actually raised a JDK limitation issue of using new Vmware >>SDK jar. The SDK jar we downloaded from Vmware site is generated by the >>Java API for XML Web Services (JAX-WS) libraries in J2SE 6.0, and will >>only work with these versions of Java and JAX-WS library. This implies >>that we can only use JDK6 to work with the pre-built Vmware SDK jar, as >>reflected by the build issue using JDK7 experienced by Chiradeep. To use >>a different JDK (and then a different version of JAX-WS library), based >>on vmware documentation, we need to rebuild the jar. See >>http://pubs.vmware.com/ >vsphere-51/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.wssdk.dsg.doc%2Fsdk_sg_introducti >on.3.5.html for details. If we want to support JDK 7, we may have to >build our own vim25.jar and find a common code path (working for both >JDK6 and JDK7) to retrieve Cookie from WS call. I talked to Kelven about >this issue, and we haven't found a better solution yet. One option may >be building our own vmware stub library, but this may not be ready for >4.2.0 release. So for now, to use Vmware SDK 5.1 (i.e. nonoss build from >master branch), we can only support JDK 6 until we come up with a better >solution. >> >> Thanks >> -min >> >
