> Does this imply that it requires 1.7 to compile, but should be compatible with > 1.6?
I'm open to requiring 1.6 instead of 1.7 for source. > > Also, we're talking about master (i.e.: not 4.1), right? I actually want this in 4.1 not just master. If a certain version of cloudstack suddenly required jre 1.7, I think it will be very difficult to go back to jre 1.6 in a later version. It also means anyone upgrading to 4.1 will require an upgrade to jre 1.7. See the conclusion on this thread [1]. --Alex [1] http://markmail.org/thread/sryxuq6ks7ukpkp6
