As long as they're separate audiences, and there are separate planners involved, it should be fine. I do wonder though if there is a good chunk of the audience that would end up choosing one or the other, for example our friends in Asia/Pacific. It would be nice to see some of those guys (or the europeans) at the US one on occasion.
We could do 1 a year, rotate continents, and put some of the resources that would have gone into the second one into sponsoring committers from outside to travel. Or we could do multiples and just assume that individuals will rotate which ones they go to if they can only do it once a year. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013, at 09:43 AM, Chip Childers wrote: >> I'm slightly concerned about the idea of doing this twice a year. I'm >> certainly no event management expert, but does that dilute the >> interest? Or is it better, due to being able to hold it in different >> geographies? > > I think it's better, we can reach a lot of people who want to use > CloudStack that might not be able to make a trip from Europe to the U.S. > for a conference. I think it's at least worth doing this year to see the > level of interest. > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
