Mike: VMware http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere5/r50/vsphere-50-configuration-maximums.pdf
XenServer/XCP: http://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us/documents/products/citrixxenserver6configurationlimits.pdf KVM: ? >From the looks of it both VMware and XenServer share a limit of 256 LUNs per >host and/or HBA. I don't believe KVM has any built-in limit, especially in >the way in which it's accessed via CS, but there are practical limits as well. > This may have more to do with the filesystem on top of the LUN (e.g. GFS2, >OCFS2, CLVM -- not really a filesystem but you get what I'm driving at). -----Original Message----- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Primary Storage Question That does answer my question, guys - thanks! On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone know if we are aware of any technical or practical limit to > the > > number of Primary Storages in a given cluster, pod, or zone for > CloudStack > > 3.x or 4.x? > > > > For example, would 1,000 be OK? How about 10,000? > > > > Thanks! > > > > I think it's really a hypervisor limit (which means it will be > different for each one), not necessarily a CloudStack limitation - > technically CloudStack only keeps a record in the database and sends > commands to the hypervisor to interact with storage. > > --David > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: [email protected] o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *(tm)*
