On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:36:02AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > I think I can update the version to 0.10, should be fine. > > And please make sure 0.10 doesn't miss license things. >
Yup - 0.10's jar has a clear copyright and NOTICE file in the jar now. I'm updating our legal docs right now to reflect the new info. > --Sheng > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > Sheng, > > > > Do you think that we can use this new version (with the clarified > > copyright and licensing) for 4.1? Or would you prefer to stick with the > > 0.8 version that's in the root pom.xml? > > > > -chip > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Jan Van Besien <janvanbes...@gmail.com> ----- > > > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:37:55 +0100 > > From: Jan Van Besien <janvanbes...@gmail.com> > > To: Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > > CC: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Correct copyright attribution for your Java IPv6 Library? > > Message-ID: <51251803.2050...@gmail.com> > > > > On 02/19/2013 09:51 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:37:17PM +0100, Jan Van Besien wrote: > >>> I'll see to updating my codebase and deliverables to include all > >>> necessary license and copyright information. This will result in a > >>> 0.10 release later this week. I'll keep you up to date. > > > > I released version 0.10 with above mentioned changes. Let me know if > > anything is missing or not in order. > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- >
