On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:40:06AM -0800, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > >
> > > At the moment I'm diving into OVM 3.2.1 Support in Cloudstack. I've
> > noticed that only 2.3 support is in there now and found some earlier mails
> > (June 2012) from people who were looking into getting 3.x support in. There
> > are several paths that could be taken with the integration, my initial 
> > thoughts
> > are to move along the lines the 2.3 implementation followed.
> > >
> > > My question is if anyone else is thinking about this or working on this 
> > > and if
> > so, if it would be useful to collaborate on this?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Funs
> > 
> > AFAIK, nobody has stepped up to "fix" OVM support in CloudStack yet..
> > and if you're willing to work on it great!
> > 
> > Frank (cc'ed) had mentioned that he was working on it for CloudPlatform [1].
> > If that's the case, he may have working code...  but it would have to be
> > donated to Apache for it to be included.  I'm also not sure what version of
> > OVM he was working to enable.
> > 
> > Frank - Can you comment, so that Funs is able to figure out where things
> > stand?  Want to collaborate with him on an Apache re-implementation?
> > 
> > -chip
> 
> The main reason OVM not working in ACS is about license.
> I have multiple important patches to OVM agent which is LGPL licensed.
> Another reason is OVM2.3 is too old, it's Domain0 kernel is 2.6.18 which is 
> approximately
> 6 years old that cannot work properly on recent hardware(the main issue we 
> faced is
> vconfig doesn't support some networkcard).
> 
> Given community is starting some effort on OVM3, I would suggest focusing 
> on OVM3 rather than bring OVM2 back
> 
>

Makes perfect sense to me!

-chip

Reply via email to