Hi Hari, Thanks for suggestions, pls find my comments inline.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:27 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > Hi Sanjay, > > The FS states that " Root/Domain Admin should be able to limit the following > resources" etc. > > Do you mean a domain admin can change the limit for his own domain? If so, > I wonder if this is appropriate?? A domain admin must be able to change only > for any/all sub-domains or accounts under his own domain or all sub-domains > - > > Does it make sense? This is already the existing behavior in CloudStack and I have updated the FS to avoid the confusion. > > Also, I don't see FS being up-to-date - for example, the detail regarding the > upgrade scenario doesn't seem to be updated, as per Chiradeep' > suggestion.. I had already updated the details regarding the upgrade scenario under "Use Cases" heading. Please let me know if anything else need to add/update. > > Can you please take of it? > > Thanks! > > Hari > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:06 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > > Comments Inline > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:22 PM > > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > > > Are there any alarms / events /warnings raised for this condition? > [] If user cross the resource limit set for his/her account, CloudStack > throws a > message to the user that limit of this resource type has been exceeded. > Apart from this CS does not send any alarm or warnings for this condition(if > there is a requirement for this, I can definitely add it into this feature). > > > Can the end-user see how much capacity he / she has left (through an > > API > > call) > > Can they see it on the UI? > [] We don't have separate API for this. To calculate the resources that are > left > for his/her account, user can use listAccounts API which displays the resource > limits and the total resources that are being consumed by that account. > In CloudStack UI, user can see the resource details under the "accounts" > detailView. > > > Should the limits be associated with an account? Or should the account > > be linked to a 'rate plan'. > > > > On 1/21/13 10:36 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> > > wrote: > > > > >Please update the FS with this important detail. > > > > > >On 1/16/13 11:52 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > > > >>Koushik, > > >> > > >>>What is the upgrade story? For e.g. say based on the existing VM's > > >>>for an account, the total CPU and RAM exceeds the global maximums. > > >>>What happens in this case? > > >> > > >> > > >>If admin sets the limits for an account and suppose that account > > >>already has existing VMs whose total CPU and RAM counts are > > >>exceeding the limits, in this case CloudStack would not shut down > > >>the VMs assigned to account to level the resources. If the user > > >>tries to deploy a VM, CS will check the limits of that account and > > >>in this case CS will not allow the account to deploy the VM. > > >> > > >>>Also for CPU number of cores are considered, should speed also be > > >>>considered? > > >>Thanks for suggestion :), we can consider speed also as a part of > > >>CPU resource. > > >> > > >>Thanks, > > >>Sanjay > > >> > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Chris Sears [mailto:chris.x.se...@sungard.com] > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:39 PM > > >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Sanjay Tripathi > > >>> <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Can anyone suggest that what should be the default max resource > > >>> > values that an account/project can have for the following global > > >>> > config > > >>> parameters: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> It seems like the least surprising default max would be to leave > > >>>them all unlimited. Otherwise, it's likely some admins will just > > >>>overlook this and then just stumble upon the arbitrary limit. If > > >>>you default to unlimited, only admins who need to restrict it will > > >>>need to be concerned with the settings. > > >>> > > >>> As an aside, I wasn't clear from the FS how to specify "unlimited" > > >>>in the UI. > > >>> Does leaving the value blank imply unlimited? > > >>> > > >>> - Chris > > >
