On 11-Feb-2013, at 10:45 AM, Rayees Namathponnan <rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Rohit, > > Did you get a chance to look this defect > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200 ? Yes I did, can you please see the comments and try with latest code. On my system it works, for deploying database did you by any chance use cloud-setup-databases? If so, I need to fix it (it does not go through DatabaseCreator). For now, you can deploy database using maven: mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb Will fix this on cloud-setup-databases today. Regards. > > QA is blocked due to this defect. > > Regards, > Rayees > > -----Original Message----- > From: Min Chen > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:37 PM > To: Rayees Namathponnan; Prachi Damle; Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; > cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation > > UUID column is added later into CloudStack system, and we never set up > not-null constraint on UUID since internally we still use internal DB id to > identify resource. > > Thanks > -min > > On 2/8/13 4:00 PM, "Rayees Namathponnan" <rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >> HI Min, >> >> Thanks for fixing the issue >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 >> >> Why we are allowing UUID null ? is there any reason for this ? >> >> I removed the blocker from this defect >> >> mysql> desc user; >> +--------------------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+- >> ---------------+ >> | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | >> +--------------------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+- >> ---------------+ >> | id | bigint(20) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | uuid | >> | varchar(40) | YES | UNI | NULL | | username | varchar(255) | NO | | >> | NULL | | password | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | | account_id | >> | bigint(20) unsigned | NO | MUL | NULL | | firstname | varchar(255) | >> | YES | | NULL | | lastname | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | | email | >> | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | | state | varchar(10) | NO | | enabled >> | | | api_key | varchar(255) | YES | UNI | NULL | | secret_key | >> | varchar(255) | YES | MUL | NULL | | created | datetime | NO | | NULL >> | | | removed | datetime | YES | MUL | NULL | | timezone | varchar(30) >> | | YES | | NULL | | registration_token | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | >> | | is_registered | tinyint(4) | NO | | 0 | | region_id | int(10) >> | unsigned | NO | | NULL | | incorrect_login_attempts | int(10) >> | unsigned | NO | | 0 | | >> +--------------------------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+- >> ---------------+ >> >> >> Regards, >> Rayees >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Min Chen >> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:20 PM >> To: Prachi Damle; Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; >> cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: Rayees Namathponnan >> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 is resolved. >> >> >> Thanks >> -min >> >> On 2/8/13 1:59 PM, "Prachi Damle" <prachi.da...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> Updated the bug with details and assigned to Rohit to fix why the 4.1 >>> schema is not getting setup. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200 >>> >>> -Prachi >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Min Chen >>> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:20 PM >>> To: Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; >>> cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Prachi Damle >>> Cc: Rayees Namathponnan >>> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation >>> >>> I am looking at the bug, could not reproduce this by running locally >>> from source code. Have updated the bug to ask for setup details. >>> Rayees, please update the bug at your earliest convenience. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -min >>> >>> On 2/8/13 11:39 AM, "Haroon Abdelrahman" >>> <haroon.abdelrah...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Min and Prachi, >>>> >>>> Could you pls check your assignments below? >>>> >>>> Haroon >>>> >>>> On 2/8/13 10:54 AM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" <sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Can these defects be looked at >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200 >>>>> >>>>> These are blocking QA to make progress to validate 41 builds ( using >>>>> hugo's changes to create packages) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> /Sudha >>>> >>> >> >
