Sheng,

You should setup the vote yourself.  The consensus of the thread seems to be 
toward reverting.

I would say for your idea to have a fair chance, you should encourage people to 
read this link [1] specifically before voting.

--Alex

[1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:44 AM
> To: Chip Childers
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Karasulu
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to"
> header?
> 
> Hi Chip,
> 
> Could you set up a formal vote thread for this?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --Sheng
> On Feb 7, 2013 6:45 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:04:07PM +0200, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > > Ooops sent this to Brett directly. Thanks for the heads up Brett.
> > >
> >
> > And here's our problem!
> >
> > Can we please ask to have the change reverted?
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied
> > mail.
> > > >> > I don't think that's useful.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their
> > > >> > own topic, but I also think make it easier for developer to keep
> > track
> > > >> > is better.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> This seems like an edge case to me... most of the time a developer
> > that
> > > >> contributes to a thread will remember to follow that subject (as I am
> > doing
> > > >> here). If that might be a problem, they have alternatives:
> > > >> - CC themselves on messages they send, so they remain on the CC list
> > > >> - set up filters to label threads that include their name
> > > >>
> > > >> Do these seem like better alternatives than altering the list
> > reply-to?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > I agree with Brett here. Filters are a life saver by the way.
> > > >
> > > > Also with the javelin branch merged, some of the envisioned
> > > > component-ization activities might enable a better mailing list
> > > > organization. This is all good stuff to consider and possibly take
> > care of
> > > > at graduation time if it still seems necessary. WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > -- Alex
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > -- Alex
> >

Reply via email to