What type of release notes, if any, are wanted for a minor release like this? 
Just the list of changes? I opened a bug to track this decision/task. If any 
doc is wanted, someone will need to pick this up.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1101

Jessica T.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:56 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS401] Apache CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating release (Second 
Round)

Hi Folks,

Bumping this - we have (not counting my own) only two PPMC folks who've voted 
on this release, and only three in total. If you can, please take some time and 
test the 4.0.1-incubating artifacts. Thanks!

Joe

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013, at 03:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> G'Day! 
> 
> Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm 
> re-starting the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release.
> 
> Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on 
> the wiki here:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+
> test+procedure
> 
> Everyone in the community is encouraged to download and test the 
> release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before 
> the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on the release, so 
> please give it a shot!
> 
> The following artifacts are up for the vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=s
> hortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0
> Commit: cd83b49ee5107f11a754679b376b8631e3535878
> 
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=b
> lob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available here as well):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/cloudstack/candidates
> /4.0.1-incubating/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 05CD14DD) 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be 
> sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier
> http://dissociatedpress.net/
> Twitter: @jzb

--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Reply via email to