Can we get Alex to review this? He is the designer of the state machine. On 1/30/13 5:26 AM, "Murali Reddy" <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote:
>On 30/01/13 2:24 PM, "Mice Xia" <mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com> wrote: > >>Agreed. >>Adding VM states are likely to have some side-effects, but for >>moveVMToUser case, does it explicitly reject other transient states such >>as stating/stopping/migrating? >> >>-Mice > >No, it just accepts any state other than 'Running' (though it should have >checked for the valid states in which VM can move to other user). > >I am just saying, there could such VM state based assumptions, you might >want to check. >
