Good luck with the bake-off!

Needless to say, if you need any help you know where to find us ;-)


Cheers,

Hugo

-----Original Message-----
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] 
Sent: woensdag 23 januari 2013 16:11
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack VS OpenStack - stack wars

Thanks guys.

Two week bake of it is..

Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ilya, it's a difficult one to answer on this list.
>
> However, if you try to remain objective I would point out some reading to 
> your management:
>
> -Dell is holding off on openstack cloud offering:
> http://www.cloudecosystem.com/author.asp?section_id=1873&doc_id=256815
>
> -HP cloud running on openstack is considered a fork (I could not find a more 
> recent article, so one would need to check this):
> http://www.wired.com/insights/2011/09/hp-launches-cloud-beta-dell-warn
> s-them-on-openstack-dont-fork-it-up/
>
> -And the gartner "warning":
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1C3IGID&ct=120919&s
> t=sb
>
> Other than that, I think the best thing to do is a 2 weeks bake off at your 
> company to evaluate what works best for your local constraints.

Ilya,

I'd agree with Sebastien...

Do a bake-off.  It's always best to try technologies like this in the lab 
setting, before making a decision.  To be fair to OpenStack - use one of the 
distros that has solved the installation complexity (like StackOps).  That lab 
time will give you the technical part of your answer.  BTW - I'd actually say 
that an even more fair bake-off would include at least one other option:  Euca, 
OpenNebula, or something else.

As for "greater adoption/usage rate", I don't want to get into that argument on 
the list.  Commercial interests surrounding both projects are going to continue 
to wage a marketing war with each other, and that means that the actual 
project's are going to be frequently judged through those filters.  I would 
consider the number of known
*production* installations of each as a way to cut through the marketing.

One concern that a business leader may have around CloudStack, given the 
previously mentioned "marketing war", is the potential longevity of the 
project.  I would think about it like this:  to me, the donation of CS to ASF 
all but assured a long life for the project.
Here, users quickly become contributors (and then committers).  Our project as 
a great "user" representation in development discussions, and that means allot 
to the life of a project.

Also consider that the ASF has a proven track record of success for large OSS 
projects.  Just think about the other Apache projects, and the success that 
they have had in the market (e.g.: the Hadoop family of projects).  That's why 
it's so important to me that the community continue to embrace the "Apache 
Way".  ;-)

-chip


> -Sebastien
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:35 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
>
>> So would like to start by saying - I'm all for CS - I really like the 
>> community, what it offers and simplicity.
>>
>> With that in mind, I need help defending CloudStack vs OpenStack to my 
>> management team.
>>
>> Basically I was approached by management team saying they attended an 
>> executive meeting and there is a much greater adoption/usage rate for 
>> openstack vs cloudstack. I don't want to mention the numbers - but they are 
>> very significant. As a point of comparison, just go to any job site (I used 
>> linkedin job search feature) and use look for number of current opening for 
>> cloudstack and then openstack.
>>
>> With that in mind, I need help defending cloudstack - in house.
>>
>> If anyone did a bake off in house - that is recent, please help and 
>> contribute to this thread.
>>
>> I will the post it on wiki if no-one objects.
>>
>> Thanks
>> ilya
>
>

Reply via email to