Can we see the patch in question? - chip
On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <[email protected]> wrote: > In that case it looks like a simple contribution and in my opinion may not > need to go through IP clearance process. Folks if you have objection to this > assessment please call out. > > Thanks > Animesh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:45 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-778] Feedback requested >> >> Hi Animesh, >> >> The feature has changes amounting to about 150 lines of code. It was intended >> specifically for vCenter deployments that would allow users to append guest >> VM instance names to the internal names shown on the hypervisor (i.e., in >> vCenter), if a global flag vm.instancename.flag is turned on, during guest VM >> creation. The feature however works on all hypervisors and has been coded >> that way, but it doesn't impinge on any existing CS functionality and should >> be >> easy to merge into ACS. The only part that may need to be done differently >> is in >> the upgrade scripts from the previous ACS version to the current one, and >> that >> would only involve putting in a new global flag. >> >> Regards, >> Vijay >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:24 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-778] Feedback requested >> >> Vijay >> >> This issue was flagged for potential IP clearance issue. Please provide some >> more details on this issue and approximate effort in LOC needed to address >> this >> issue. Community needs to determine the contribution effort and then call >> out >> whether it needs to go through IP clearance. >> >> >> Thanks >> Animesh >> >>> Chip Childers reopened CLOUDSTACK-778: >>> -------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> Reopening, since we (1) don't have the code in the repo and (2) need >>> to sort out the ip ownership questions on this feature before >>> inclusion. Please feel free to submit to reviewboard, but note that >>> we should NOT commit until ip clearance is complete. >
