Radhika We can tie in your documentation work with corresponding feature's IP clearance review
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8812/ is linked to Sheng's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-306 https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/ can be linked to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299 https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/ is tricky since it refers to multiple issues but can be linked to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-265 & https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-778 I don't see any others under your name needing to go through clearance. Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:47 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened > > Thanks Animesh. I do not have a personal Github space yet ! > > Plus, https://reviews.apache.org/r/8812/ is already submitted. However, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-800 is reopened. > > The other items are up on the Apache Review board. > > Chip/ David: What is your take on this ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:19 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened > > IMO if a specific features has more than a few review items, it is easier to > put > all of them into one place. That is easier for community to review and vote on > the feature than having to work through many review board threads. > > Thanks > Animesh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:25 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened > > > > Hi David, > > > > How is the workflow for non-committers ? > > > > I do not have the credential to log in to A.O. > > > > However, my patches are up on Review Board. > > > > Thanks > > -Radhika > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:20 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Frank Zhang <frank.zh...@citrix.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Jessica Tomechak > > >> <jessica.tomec...@citrix.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > John, > > >> > No, the Apache license doesn't appear in the published Citrix > > >> CloudPlatform documentation. It's inside our source files, which > > >> are seen only by the writers. The published documentation has a > > >> Citrix copyright > > page. > > >> I am not sure of the legal ramifications, but I know that Citrix > > >> always intended for our doc source files (minus any Citrix-specific > > >> differences) to be part of the ACS project. > > >> > > > >> > Still waiting to know where to post the contributions so they can > > >> > be put > > >> through the same process as the rest of that code from CP 3.0.6... > > >> > > >> Your people.a.o personal web space, review board, attached to the > > >> jira, or somewhere else. It's completely up to you. > > > > > > > > > How to use people.a.o? I spent 15 minutes but could not figure out > > > any portal to login, though I did see my name in committer list > > > > > > > Your username and password are your ASF creds. > > You can ssh/scp files into people.a.o (and put stuff in the > > public_html directory) It will show up on people.apache.org/~username > > > > --David
