On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 03:07 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since packaging is a theme yet again (and we seem to be headed in a
>> direction that is useful for a distro packager), I wanted to raise the
>> idea of trying to work with various Linux distros to get CloudStack
>> into their official package repos.  I see the 4.1.0 release as being
>> the ideal release
>>
>> I know that we have had various packagers represented on this list on
>> and off, and I suspect that there are quite a few lurkers hanging
>> around.
>>
>> My question to the community is: does it make sense for the Apache
>> CloudStack community to reach out to various linux disto communities
>> and see if they would be willing to include the software (as well as
>> offer packaging help if needed)?
>>
>> My questions to folks that might be on this list representing
>> different distros: Are you interested?  If so, how can we work with
>> your community most effectively?  Last, CloudStack is obviously still
>> a podling (and our release numbers still reflect "-incubating").  Is
>> our graduation a prerequisite in your opinion?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> I'm honestly not sure if CloudStack is something that we want in a
> distribution.
>
> Yes, I know that Ubuntu fully adopted OpenStack and you can very easily
> deploy OpenStack nodes now.
>
> But thinking about the extra work it would bring to the project by keeping
> all the packages synced. If we find a critical bug it's a lot of work to get
> that all synced with the distros.
>
> If you really want to run a cloud, how hard is it to add a repo to your
> Apt/Yum configuration?
>
> Wido

That's a fair argument.  Not personally knowing what the CloudStack
release to potential distro release cycle would look like, I'd like to
hear more about that from others (or yourself ;-) ).

To me, the positive side of this is the potential to grow our
user-base and get more interest from distro developers in helping on
the project.

-chip

Reply via email to