Exactly, so this is not a full fledged fix. Do you have a plan in mind to take 
care of volumes already facing this issue ? Remember that the volumes created 
from ISO will also have template_id as null so I understand that this is a bit 
tricky.

From: Saksham Srivastava 
<saksham.srivast...@citrix.com<mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com>>
Reply-To: Saksham Srivastava 
<saksham.srivast...@citrix.com<mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com>>
To: Devdeep Singh <devdeep.si...@citrix.com<mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com>>
Cc: Saksham Srivastava 
<saksham.srivast...@citrix.com<mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com>>, 
"cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>"
 
<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>>,
 Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-924: source_template_id set to NULL 
when a template is created from a snapshot

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8900/


On January 9th, 2013, 8:43 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:

You need to take care of migration as well. Any thoughts on that ?

The fix is only for the new volumes which are created from snapshots which were 
themselves created from volumes which have a non-null template id.
In case of parent volume carrying a null template id, the subsequent volumes 
created from it will be having null template id.





- saksham


On January 9th, 2013, 7:29 a.m., saksham srivastava wrote:

Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
By saksham srivastava.

Updated Jan. 9, 2013, 7:29 a.m.

Description

Volumes created from snapshots misses the source template information.Fixed the 
issue with volumes now getting the template id.


Testing

Verified on local setup. from 
template1->instance->snapshot1->volume1->snapshot2->template2
template2 now has source template id.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-924
Diffs

 *   server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java (96f299c)

View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8900/diff/>

Reply via email to