So: 1. There needs to be both kinds of networks available (persistent as well as non-persistent) in the same zone? >From an end-user perspective this is going to be confusing since she has not been exposed to this internal state before (and generally the end-user is not aware of the internal state of the infrastructure). Is it OK to make this behavior zone-wide, I.e., on every guest network?
On 12/31/12 10:19 AM, "Manan Shah" <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: >Thanks Likitha for picking up this requirement. You have correctly >interpreted the requirements. > >Regards, >Manan Shah > > > > >On 12/31/12 2:52 AM, "Likitha Shetty" <likitha.she...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I would like to work on the proposed feature. >>Restating the requirement. Currently in CloudStack when a user creates a >>network, a db entry for that network is made, a VLAN ID is assigned and >>the network is created only when the first VM on that network is created. >>With this feature CloudStack should allow users to provision the created >>network i.e. assign a VLAN ID and implement the network without having to >>deploy VM's on that network. >> >>Comments/Suggestions on the requirement ? >> >>Thank you, >>Likitha >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:01 AM >>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: [DISCUSS] Persistent Networks without a running VM >> >>Hi, >> >>I would like to propose a new feature for persistent networks without >>running VMs. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the requirements >>at the following location. Please provide feedback on the requirements. >> >>JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-706 >>Requirements: >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Persistent+Network >>s >> >>Regards, >>Manan Shah >> >
