I'm on official 4.0 release. I will try to reproduce what I can. I will probably file few more UI bugs on the way, spexifically when you do advanced network setup as I had to resort to API to get what UI did not accomplish.
Side note, id like to create rpms from source code/git identical to what is done on Jenkins. Is this documented? Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: Has the master branch really diverged that much at this point? Also, I think Ilya has mostly been using the 4.0 release anyway (but we can wait for confirmation of that). - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Nov 26, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Pranav Saxena <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you are right then . We should definitely back port them to 4.0 as > well but I am not very sure , if we can reproduce all of them there . If you > could reproduce these issues once on 4.0 , I can backport the fixes > immediately . > > Thanks, > Pranav > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1 > > Pranav, > > They have been all addressed but are not on 4.0 branch, my request is to > backport them to 4.0 to be available on 4.0.1 release. > > Is it not applicable to 4.0? > > Thanks > ilya > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1 > > Few of the bugs mentioned below have been fixed by me and the code changes > have been pushed into asf/master . The remaining ones also seem to have been > addressed . Could you please verify once more ? > > Thanks & Regards, > Pranav > > -----Original Message----- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1 > > jzb - below is the list of bugs that should be minimally impacting and are UI > changes > > > Least intrusive - UI Changes > --- > CLOUDSTACK-474 > Create NetworkOffering wizard should provide dropdown for LB isolation when > LB is set to External devices & guest_type is set to Shared > --- > CLOUDSTACK-475 > cloudstack UI - create network offering - Hide VPC checkbox when Guest Type > is Shared. Show it when Guest Type is Isolated. > ---- > CLOUDSTACK-476 > cloudstack UI - create network offering - Supported Source NAT type dropdown > - set "Per zone" as default option. > ---- > CLOUDSTACK-477 > cloudstack UI - zone wizard - When Advanced/SecurityGroup is selected, pass > forVirtualNetwork=false to createVlanIpRange API. > ---- > CLOUDSTACK-439 > Alert with typo and outdated text regarding "direct attached public IPs" > > > Additional least intrusive nice to haves > > ---- > CLOUDSTACK-523 > When adding Vms to an LB rule , when there are vms with display name that > were provided by user and autogenearated uuid , the list vm screen extends > beyond the frames original width.. > ---- > CLOUDSTACK-459 > [Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone] Associate IP Checkbox > in Create Network Offering Dialog is Displayed When Elastic LB is Selected > ---- > > > I will file more bug reports that I was under impression - have been > addressed by above- but as I reviewed the bug details - I don't believe they > have been addressed. > > Thanks > ilya > > > > > >
