On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:16:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > We could also do something else like align major revs with target > platforms, e.g. 4.0 targets centos 6.x and Ubuntu 12.04, with minor revs > being feature releases. That may help solidify the support life cycle as > well, and we just rev when the next generation of platforms is chosen and > tested.
The problem with targeting major revs with target platforms is that the primary target platforms aren't on similar development cycles. CentOS follows RHEL, which isn't on the same cadence as Ubuntu LTS. If we're picking a platform to base the release cycles on, we'd have to choose between one or the other. -- Joe Brockmeier Twitter: @jzb http://dissociatedpress.net/
