On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > Thank you David! You said what I am thinking. > > Wido > > Op 13 okt. 2012 om 19:11 heeft David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> het volgende > geschreven: > >> Hi folks: >> >> So a couple of comments. >> I appreciate the level of passion seen in this thread - it tells me >> that people love CloudStack. That said, open source projects competing >> among themselves is almost always fruitless. The world is large enough >> for two, three, or more open source IaaS projects. (Just like the >> world is big enough for PostgreSQL and MySQL; Red Hat, Ubuntu, SLES, >> Slackware, and others.) In short, this project's goal is not to beat >> OpenStack. The goal is to be a useful, stable, community-led >> Infrastructure-as-a-Service open source project. >> >> When you see articles that contain misinformation, it's perfect >> acceptable to provide corrections. It's also important to catch what >> they see as legitimate defects - file those as bugs, and lets correct >> them. Far more valuable though, IMO, is that we spend our time doing >> the the following two things: >> 1. Testing, fixing, and documenting Apache CloudStack so that it is >> the best IaaS platform available. (Have you tested the latest 4.0.0 RC >> builds?) >> 2. Telling the story of how/why we use CloudStack (notice I didn't say >> why it's better, or why it beats $foo project) >> >> To that end, John Kinsella has been working with Apache Infrastructure >> to get an Apache CloudStack planet setup where we can aggregate such >> blogs, so watch for updates on this front and consider aggregating >> your blog there, but don't hesitate to start blogging now :) >> >> --David
I just have to say while I agree with the proverbial be nice and provide information, its not worth the fight, I refuse to let lies and invalid assessments go unanswered. Yes, we all have a place, but that place need not be diminished because of the completely misstated facts and lies regarding the matter.
