On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: > bz2 seems pretty standard to me by now… > > For the 10/10 RC, the tar.gz was 10895157B, when I re-compressed as .tar.bz2 > it's 8536610 - 22% smaller. For a few hundred downloads, the ASF servers (and > various ISPs) will thank you...
Fair enough! I'll make the change. > John > > On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Chip Childers >>> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>>> Since I unilaterally setup the release do to both .zip and .tar.gz, >>>> I'd like to convert to ONLY releasing .tar.gz. >>>> >>>> Without disagreement, I'll assume consensus. >>>> >>>> I'm going to move forward with that change, for the purpose of getting >>>> done... but I can always revert if there is a disagreement. >>>> >>>> -chip >>> >>> >>> Yes please. >>> >>> And to be contrarian - lets do it as bz2 :) >>> >>> --David >>> >> >> Are you being serious about bz2? I'd disagree about doing that, since >> gz is more well known and understood (IMO, or perhaps just by me). >> > > Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service > o: 415.315.9385 > @johnlkinsella >
