+1, great start! Regards, Sateesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message." > -----Original Message----- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:26 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round > > +1, we are finally there! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:21 PM, "Chip Childers (ASF)" <chipchild...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release > > 4.0.0-incubating. > > > > Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure > > > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > > artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so please > > give it a shot! > > > > > > The following artifacts are up for the vote: > > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0.0-incubating/ > > > > PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58): > > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0 > > Commit: 5ee613fbf2da5f6212f2f166c980506e0c6cb5cb > > > > List of changes: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0 > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be > > sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Thanks! > > > > -chip
