Yep, sorry. Mixing the streams because Joe brought up the filings. :)

Thanks for offering to follow up on legal-discuss. I'll keep an eye open
for it.

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > Chip, as far as I know, our current status is:
> >
> >    - Any incompatible files, or files we didn't use, have been removed or
> >    clean-roomed
> >    - Files from projects with an incompatible license have permission
> >    obtained from the copyright holders
> >    - Everything else has been checked and verified as having Citrix
> >    provenance
> >
> > Perhaps you have numbers to go along with this?
>
> I don't, but you are correct.  AFAIK, we are good to go with the
> source tree and legal documentation.
>
> > I believe we should take this status to the original config file thread
> on
> > legal-discuss, and wrap things up there.
>
> That thread was specific to the question of "config files".  I'll
> follow up over there specifically on that topic.
>
> > Just checked the legal thread, and it seems that Sam and Roy are trying
> to
> > work out how to proceed.
>
> That's a different thread.  Sam and Roy are talking about the export
> filings.  I'd agree that we should simply proceed with executing the
> filing.
>
> Joe - Do you need / want any help with it?
>
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012, at 02:30 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> >> > There was one bug that was reopened on Sunday to add a public domain
> >> > statement for the rsyslog.conf file for our LICENSE file.  I completed
> >> > that this morning, so AFAIK we are now done!
> >> >
> >> > I *think* the only outstanding ASF legal / policy item to resolve are
> >> > the export filings.  The thread seems to have gone nowhere on
> >> > legal-discuss@a.o, after some prodding by Noah.
> >> >
> >> > Noah (or others) - any ideas on how to drive that one to resolution?
> >>
> >> The last action (that I can see) was by Jim J. and he took it to
> >> legal-internal last Thursday. I've pinged him on the legal-discuss list
> >> to see if there's been any response.
> >>
> >> The other option, I guess, is to go ahead and prepare the filings. I've
> >> started on that, though I would not be at all disappointed if we were
> >> told it was unnecessary.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Joe
> >> --
> >> Joe Brockmeier
> >> j...@zonker.net
> >> Twitter: @jzb
> >> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>



-- 
NS

Reply via email to