On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > Do we intend to release anything with the version 4.0.0.beta1? If not, you > could change it to 4.0.0. It is fine for the source to be configured to > display "4.0.0" and preparations of that source to say "4.0.0" even though > it has not been released yet. (As long as those preparations/builds are not > distributed to end users. Posting to this list is obviously okay.)
As a developer, I like having some sort of revision number to let me know what I've downloaded. For these builds, I would prefer to have that distinction in the file name. The internal code references version 4.0.0, so that is in like with your note above. > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote: > >> All, >> >> For those of you helping review the source code for legal / policy >> compliance, I've posted a new source code only package (4.0.0.beta1) >> here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/cloudstack/4.0/ >> >> As always, we will rely on community support to host binary builds >> from these source packages. >> >> -chip >> > > > > -- > NS
