Sorry by phys box I meant host

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:43 PM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> wrote:

> That is correct, the network is flat.  This is a re-working of the
> devcloud environment, so it's going to look similar to that.
> 
> There is no "physical" box, as this is all running in virtual box.
> 
> 
> James
> 
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote:
>> Your network is completely flat. Make sure you only have 1 interface active 
>> on your physical box, or your network pathing will be screwed.
>> 
>> POD = mgmt network
>> GUEST = vm network
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:18 PM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> in my devcloud.cfg file (attached) I have:
>>> 
>>>           "pods": [
>>>               {
>>>                   "endip": "10.0.2.220",
>>>                   "name": "test00",
>>>                   "startip": "10.0.2.200",
>>>                   "guestIpRanges": [
>>>                       {
>>>                           "startip": "10.0.2.100",
>>>                           "endip": "10.0.2.199",
>>>                           "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>>>                           "gateway": "10.0.2.2"
>>>                       }
>>>                   ],
>>>                   "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>>>                   "clusters": [
>>>                       {
>>>                           "clustername": "test000",
>>>                           "hypervisor": "XenServer",
>>>                           "hosts": [
>>>                               {
>>>                                   "username": "root",
>>>                                   "url": "http://10.0.2.15/";,
>>>                                   "password": "password"
>>>                               }
>>>                           ],
>>>                           "clustertype": "CloudManaged",
>>>                           "primaryStorages": [
>>>                               {
>>>                                   "url":
>>> "nfs://10.0.2.15:/opt/storage/primary",
>>>                                   "name": "PS0"
>>>                               } ]
>>>                       }
>>>                   ],
>>>                   "gateway": "10.0.2.2"
>>>               }
>>>           ],
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote:
>>>> Seems odd but you could be short IPs for the POD pool.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:58 AM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" <kel...@bbits.ca> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The database check the IP allocation and network pools alongside the 
>>>>> storage pool
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:56 AM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Primary storage and Secondary storage are good according to the GUI.
>>>>>> Is that what you are referring to?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> James
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits <kel...@bbits.ca> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Just winging it here but for scope interface errors check that your 
>>>>>>> pools are not completely allocated.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think I fixed one problem but solved another..  I had to add
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>>>        "name":"system.vm.use.local.storage",
>>>>>>>>        "value":"false"
>>>>>>>>    },
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> to the devcloud.cfg and no longer receive that error.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> My SSVMs and CPVMs still aren't starting.  I've attached a big log
>>>>>>>> that should capture the context of the errors.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Ahmad Emneina
>>>>>>>> <ahmad.emne...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hey James, can you post more logs. I'm interested to see the logs 
>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>> what was pasted in the previous email. I think the real reason hides
>>>>>>>>> there...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 9/30/12 8:50 AM, "James Martin" <jmar...@basho.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This was because I did have the nfs service subscribing to
>>>>>>>>>> /etc/exports in the puppet recipe.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm back to the same error as before:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 10:16:49,695 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped
>>>>>>>>>> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
>>>>>>>>>> null host id before state transition: null
>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 10:16:49,703 WARN
>>>>>>>>>> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null)
>>>>>>>>>> Exception while trying to start console proxy
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
>>>>>>>>>> create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-TEST]Scope=interface
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerI
>>>>>>>>>> mpl.java:734)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav
>>>>>>>>>> a:472)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav
>>>>>>>>>> a:465)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyMana
>>>>>>>>>> gerImpl.java:624)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyM
>>>>>>>>>> anagerImpl.java:1154)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyMana
>>>>>>>>>> gerImpl.java:1961)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyMana
>>>>>>>>>> gerImpl.java:170)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:113)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>>>>>>>>>> at 
>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acces
>>>>>>>>>> s$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(S
>>>>>>>>>> cheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:
>>>>>>>>>> 1110)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java
>>>>>>>>>> :603)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 10:16:49,730 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>> (secstorage-1:null) Expunging Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT]
>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 10:16:49,742 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>> (secstorage-1:null) Marking volume that was never created as
>>>>>>>>>> destroyed: Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT]
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:28 AM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> My SSVM never starts (or the CPVM for the matter).   In the GUI I 
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Zones: 1
>>>>>>>>>>> Pods: 1
>>>>>>>>>>> Clusters: 1
>>>>>>>>>>> Hosts : 1
>>>>>>>>>>> Primary Storage : 0
>>>>>>>>>>> Secondary Storage : 1
>>>>>>>>>>> System VMs  : 0
>>>>>>>>>>> Virtual Routers : 0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Also,  These messages keep repeating in the logs:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,012 DEBUG 
>>>>>>>>>>> [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>> (SnapshotPollTask:null) Snapshot scheduler.poll is being called at
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,013 DEBUG 
>>>>>>>>>>> [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>> (SnapshotPollTask:null) Got 0 snapshots to be executed at 2012-09-30
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:51:01 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,055 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [cloud.network.ExternalLoadBalancerUsageManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>> (ExternalNetworkMonitor-1:null) External load balancer devices stats
>>>>>>>>>>> collector is running...
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,106 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>> (RouterMonitor-1:null) Found 0 running routers.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,120 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,064 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-1:null) StorageCollector is running...
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,066 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-1:null) There is no secondary storage VM for 
>>>>>>>>>>> secondary
>>>>>>>>>>> storage host nfs://10.0.2.15:/opt/storage/secondary
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,072 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,943 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-1:null) Ping from 1
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,706 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,714 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-14:null) Seq 1-164560912: Executing request
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,874 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-14:null) Seq 1-164560912: Response Received:
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,875 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-1:null) Seq 1-164560912: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
>>>>>>>>>>> 8796761203466, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } }
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,640 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Executing request
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,797 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Response Received:
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,798 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>>>>>>>>>> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
>>>>>>>>>>> 8796761203466, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> [{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":1,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false
>>>>>>>>>>> ,"result":true,"wait":0}}]
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,279 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>>>>>>>>>> Primary storage is not ready, wait until it is ready to launch
>>>>>>>>>>> secondary storage vm
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,279 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>>>>>>>>>> Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,568 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null)
>>>>>>>>>>> Skip capacity scan due to there is no Primary Storage UPintenance 
>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Æ
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> <log.txt>

Reply via email to