On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > I agree - there are also practical problems from a packaging perspecting. > 4.0.0.5 is version 4.0.0.5 - but 4.0.0-5 is version 4.0.0 release 5. > Plus we've agreed previously on a versioning strategy of n.y.z
You have to be exceptionally careful here. 4.0.0-5 is only "release" 5 if you have voted on it. Perhaps you mean build 5? I am presuming that anything with a build number will never be voted on, and will never be in release? Is the versioning scheme documented anywhere? This came up on another thread, and I suggested Semantic Versioning, and someone chimed in with support of that. Thanks, -- NS
