> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 13 August 2012 17:29
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Branching for 4.0?
> 
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Ewan Mellor
> <ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> >> Sent: 13 August 2012 17:09
> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: [ASFCS40] Branching for 4.0?
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> It didn't look like the 4.0 branch had been created yet, but we had
> >> discussed creating it today.  I went ahead and created it just now.
> >>
> >> Unless there are serious objections to the branch having been
> >> created, I guess we're considering this branch to be the working copy
> >> that we should all be testing / stabilizing.
> >>
> >> Please yell if someone was expecting this to be done later.
> >> Otherwise, please make sure that any 4.0 bug fixes are patched in
> >> both master and the 4.0 branch!
> >
> > Thanks Chip.  We were just talking about that -- you beat us to it, but we
> were right about to do the same.
> >
> > Alex has agreed to be gatekeeper for this branch, so it'll be his job to
> perform that extra review on what goes into the release branch, and to
> make sure that the quality stays high.  Reviews can continue into master as
> normal, and Alex will pull across things that are suitable for release.  This 
> will
> hopefully be everything, but he'll be an extra check to make sure.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ewan.
> >
> >
> 
> Ewan - Just to make sure it's straight in my head (and for everyone
> else):  You're suggesting that everyone works in master, and that Alex will
> pull everything that looks right from master to 4.0?  And by "everyone",
> we're talking both committers committing directly into master, as well as
> folks submitting review requests via review board?

Yes, that's exactly what I was saying.  That way, we do our normal quality 
checks (either through Review Board or through trusting the committers to get 
it right by themselves) and then Alex will pass a second pair of eyes over 
things before he cherry-picks them, to make sure that the release branch is 
extra high quality.

I still would like everyone to act as if they are closing down for a release, 
and be careful about what goes into master.  Having a release branch doesn't 
mean that we open master up to any old thing (if we did that, cherry-picking 
would be a nightmare).

Cheers,

Ewan.

Reply via email to