Done! Signed and sent. Thanks, -Vijay V.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ewan Mellor > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:48 AM > To: [email protected]; Pranav Saxena; David Nalley > Cc: Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena Prokharchyk; Deepak Garg > Subject: RE: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale changes in > Apache master > > Hi Ram, > > For a start, we need Vijay and anyone else who's worked on this code to sign > the ICLA and scan and send it to [email protected]. > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas. Citrix has already signed the > corporate CLA and we have authorization to sign ICLAs for submissions to > Apache, so there's nothing internal that you need to do. > > Thanks, > > Ewan. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 02 August 2012 10:02 > > To: Pranav Saxena; David Nalley > > Cc: [email protected]; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena > > Prokharchyk; Deepak Garg > > Subject: RE: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale > > changes in Apache master > > > > David, > > > > We did discuss the AutoScale feature in the apache forum, followed the > > process by creating a topic branch and follow patch process as and > > when they arise. As Vijay\Deepak have no committer privileges we had > > to route it through pranav. Functional specs is available at > > http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/DesignDocs/Auto+Scale+Feature. If > > there are gaps in the process followed please let us know > > > > Thanks, > > Ram > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Pranav Saxena > > > Sent: 02 August 2012 18:28 > > > To: David Nalley > > > Cc: [email protected]; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena > > > Prokharchyk; Deepak Garg; Ram Ganesh > > > Subject: RE: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale > > > changes in Apache master > > > > > > Hi David , > > > > > > As I mentioned in my previous mail , Vijay Venkatchalam and Deepak > > > Garg are the authors for the backend code and me , Jessica and > > > Sanjay have been responsible for the UI development for this > > > feature. Vijay has sent out a mail to the cloudstack dev community > regarding the " > > > Autoscale" feature. I think you happened to miss the mails sent by > > > Vijay and Deepak in this regard. And whatever code has been merged > > > later on after the creation of the asf/autoscale branch has been > > > sent through review requests on the dev ML. > > > > > > Kindly have a look at the mails sent by Vijay and let me know > > > whatever decisions I have to abide by . I will be more than happy to > > > follow your advice. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Pranav > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:46 PM > > > To: Pranav Saxena > > > Cc: [email protected]; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena > > > Prokharchyk; Deepak Garg > > > Subject: What to do with Autoscale: was: Re: [6/11] AutoScale > > > changes in Apache master > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Pranav Saxena > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > This commit was based on addition of a new feature called > > > > AutoScale > > > on which few guys from Bangalore have been working on , including me . > > > Since this feature was supposed to be pushed in today y , so we had > > > to create a new branch asf/autoscale ( pulled out of 3.0.x - citrix > > > private branch ) and push the changes there. This was as per Alena's > > > request that I should proceed by pushing the changes for the > > > Autoscale feature (since I am the only committer here in Bangalore) > > > by creating a new branch on apache and the author( Vijay ) would > > > send out an email on the cloudstack dev list , mentioning about the > Autoscale feature. > > > We'll be merging some more changes very soon. > > > > > > > > @Vijay - could you please elaborate on the Autoscale feature ? > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Pranav > > > > > > Pranav, et al. > > > > > > This is still problematic. For the time being, lets hold off on > > > additional commits to this branch till we get some of the process > > > and IP issues sorted. > > > > > > First, who are the authors for the code that's been committed to > > > this branch, you mention 'a few guys in BLR', but who are they > specifically? > > > > > > Second, as a group the project needs to decide if we want to include > > > this feature, and if so, how we will handle inclusion. (There are a > > > number of potential options here, the PPMC could send it through IP > > > Clearance at the Incubator, or a Software Grant, or something more > > > simple.) Don't be surprised if this involves deleting the branch or > > > reverting the commits and handling submission in some other manner. > > > > > > --David
