On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:47 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> >> >> It's different in that the submitter has to go to Review Board and >> create an account, etc. >> >> If it's a one-off minor patch, a fair number of people are likely to >> just say "meh" and drop it. Forcing people to use Review Board means >> we'll lose some number of contributions. >> >> I'd suggest a better way is to heavily encourage Review Board as the >> "official" submission method, and quietly allow email or attachments to >> bugs. > > > This seems to be the conclusion of this thread, even though review board is > not perfect. > We can edit the wiki page to clarify the non-committer workflow, and document > review board process as well as "wido's" email workflow... >
Edit boldly!
