On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Rajesh Battala <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 8:40 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Hibernate >> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Rajesh Battala <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Shall I proceed to replace Hibernate Framework with Spring JDBC. >> > >> >> This is not a design decision to take lightly, or rush - as we've talked >> about >> replacing the custom ORM that CloudStack uses as well - we'd want to make >> a decision on something that we are comfortable with in that role as well. >> > [Rajesh Battala] > So we are planning to implement some ORM framework for CloudStack also? > If so, then we need to evaluate the available ORM frameworks for java which > are based on Apache License? >
I don't want to speak for Alex, but I have heard him mention such a change number of times, and have seen it in his slides as well. But the larger sense is that if we are going to change something in AWSAPI for communicating to the database, it should be something that we are comfortable with adopting in the long term for the rest of CloudStack, otherwise we'll end up with two different ways for connecting to the database, which is fail. --David
