The intent of my note was to put forth the intended project name, logo, and copyright which will be used for documentation within the Apache project called CloudStack. I suppose the fact that it will differ from the Citrix commercial version was a "red herring" which distracted from the point of the note. Sorry about that.
Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -----Original Message----- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:03 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Jessica Tomechak; Radhika Puthiyetath; David Nalley (da...@cloudstack.org) Subject: Re: Citrix CloudStack product vs. Apache CloudStack project technical documentation On 05/16/2012 02:14 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Assuming that the next CloudStack release occurs simultaneously within the > Citrix product family and in the Apache project, we will need to create both > open-source and commercial versions of CloudStack Install Guides, Release > Notes, etc. (see http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14860). > > The project and product have not yet diverged much, so we probably just > change the product name, logo, and copyright statement. From discussions so > far, it seems like the following will be used for the open-source project > docs: > Since this e-mail hit the CloudStack developer mailinglist I'm wondering what the Apache project has to do with a commercial version of the documentation and/or internal Citrix products? The Apache project will only focus on the Open Source version where the "commercial" version with separate documentation is something that is up to Citrix, am I right? Or did I read this e-mail wrong? Wido > > * Apache CloudStack > > * Feather (and > mascot<http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/CloudStack+mascot+proposals> > if available) > > * CC-BY-SA > > Please let us know if there are any comments about this approach. > > Jessica T. > CloudStack Tech Pubs >
