On Monday, April 30, 2012 08:08:51 PM Kevin Kluge wrote: > OK, I just added that as a fourth issue. Thanks.
As Brett stated, please do not constrain yourself with the template. That's the minimal set of information that is asked. Projects are encouraged to provide a more details if they feel it's warranted. Specifically for Cloudstack, I'd suggest adding a paragraph just before the list of issues that describes the state of the community. Nothing major at all. Something like: ------------- Cloudstack just entered the incubator a couple of weeks ago. Since then, the mailing list has been setup and discussions have started to move to there with several "new names" participating due to the new Apache location. Currently, the code repository is still at Citrix, but the community is looking forward to getting that moved to Apache as soon as possible. ------------ Basically, the list of issues is just that, a list of issues. While the issues are important, I'd normally like to see the POSSITIVE things going on in the community as well. I haven't followed the development closely, has anyone submitted a new patch? This early, that would be a good thing. Not a big deal as the current report covers the minimum requirements, but I usually hate aiming for the minimum. :-) Dan > > -kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett > > Porter Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 6:01 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for May 2012 ([ppmc]) > > > > On 01/05/2012, at 4:34 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > > > I haven't seen changes to our board report in a few days. Can we get > > > one> > > of the mentors to sign off on it? > > > > I'll take a look. > > > > > We could discuss the "top 3" issues blocking graduation. I wish we > > > could> > > do 4. I'd like to add that we need to remove the non-ASF-approved > > license code from the project as it's clearly a blocker. But, I felt > > that getting a development process defined was a prerequisite to that, > > so I omitted the license issue and left the development process in > > place. > > > > Please don't feel constrained by the "template", which is only there to > > make sure important information isn't omitted. Add anything you think > > is relevant to the status of the podling. > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > br...@apache.org > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > http://twitter.com/brettporter -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
