All fantastic suggestions. The EXPLAIN results showed that changing to
logging_userindex had potentially the largest impact (reducing the rows to
be retrieved from 10mil to 5mil). I am rerunning the query with all
suggested recommendations, and will report back.

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Dennis Tobar <dennis.to...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Replace count(*) with count(1) in the subquery. It could help (?) to
> improve the performance.
>
> Dennis Tobar Calderón
> (Enviado desde un móvil)
>
> El 30 dic. 2017 3:10 p. m., "John" <phoenixoverr...@gmail.com> escribió:
>
>> I would also find the first log of 2017 and use that instead of the
>> timestamp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
>> Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
> Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

Reply via email to