On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:02:36 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 7:24:17 AM UTC-6, Mike Rodriguez wrote: >> >> That sounds like a good idea to me. I think the major potential issue is >> that it creates ambiguity and non-deterministic dispatch for Clojure maps >> in CollReduce (as IPersistentMaps are both Iterable and Seqable). So that >> would need to be resolved. >> > Yes, I thought of that and should have mentioned it in my post. It seems I often run into this issue with extending protocols to types and causing non-determinism. It'd be hard to pinpoint a "lower" type to cover these non-Clojure maps too. I suppose java.util.AbstractMap would cover a large group, but that still seems a bit arbitrary.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
