On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 11:53:10 AM UTC-6, Tom Locke wrote: > > I haven't watched the keynote so I look forward to that. I sure Rich's > arguments will convince me, as always! > > In my case I am spec'ing rather complex and deeply nested structures. The > conformed values are changed all the way down. I have a bunch of functions > to interrogate these structures in useful ways, none of which I can use in > my specs. What would be recommended practice here? >
If you are mostly seeing this with s/or, then using something s/nonconforming around ors could help you. > In the slack channel someone mentioned a possible forthcoming version of > s/and that doesn't flow conformed values through. That sounds like it might > do the trick, and has the advantage of putting the decision with the spec > consumer. > Also something we're considering. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
