And I thought we had it bad with the whole Brexit saga over here :-).

On 9 November 2016 at 12:23, Mikera <mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given recent events, I advise caution when it comes to relying on votes to
> make important decisions.
>
> On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 23:33:43 UTC+8, Alex Miller wrote:
>>
>> In the spirit of the US election today, I thought I would mention voting
>> on Clojure tickets. Clojure manages bugs and enhancement requests in JIRA.
>> Anyone can create a JIRA account and vote on open tickets in the system (no
>> contributor agreement is required to vote).
>>
>> In the core team, we look at votes on tickets to be aware of what the
>> community cares about and as one input to the order in which tickets are
>> considered. However, the most-voted tickets in the system have fewer than 30
>> votes and I suspect that there are many thousands of people with opinions
>> about which of these tickets are important.
>>
>> If you'd like to see the lists of the highest voted tickets in the system,
>> you can do so in these reports:
>> - Highest voted defects
>> - Highest voted enhancements
>>
>> Andy Fingerhut also has a weighted voting report that updates about once a
>> week. This show a different perspective - I'm not sure which is more useful
>> but I look at both.
>>
>> If you'd like to learn more about the process:
>> - Overview of contribution links
>> - JIRA workflow
>> - A blog I wrote describing the process
>>
>> A few examples of highly voted issues that have been included in 1.9 so
>> far:
>> - CLJ-1224 Records do not cache hash like normal maps (21 votes)
>> - CLJ-1298 Add more type predicate fns to core (18 votes)
>> - CLJ-1744 Unused destructured local not cleared, causes memory leak (17
>> votes)
>> - CLJ-1242 = on sorted collections with different key types incorrectly
>> throws (7 votes)
>> - CLJ-401    Add seqable? predicate (7 votes)
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to