I find the semantic of the new (any?) function to be in conflict with (not-any?) and a strange addition, at least with the chosen name. This concern has come up on the "clojure dev" group as well. I have found a different implementation of (any?) useful in my own projects:
(defn any? [pred coll] (not (not-any? pred coll))) I found it odd that (not-any? pred coll) existed without (any? pred coll). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
