I am using Anglican for estimating parameters of epidemiological models, 
generally in the shape of limited (mortality) data, and less than a dozen 
parameters that need to be simultaneously estimated. Works fine for that. A 
good example of that type of problem is 
here: http://www.smallperturbation.com/epidemic-with-real-data (but with 
PyMC, a similar package for python).

But you might be right that it won't hold in high-dimensional problems. 
People in genomics are running models with many thousands of parameters 
when trying to figure out how different genes contribute to a particular 
cell phenotype. Don't think I would try that in Anglican :-).


On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 6:06:49 PM UTC+2, Dragan Djuric wrote:
>
> Thanks. I know about Anglican, but it is not even in the same category, 
> other than being Bayesian. Anglican also has MCMC, but, looking at the 
> implementation, it seems it is useful only on smaller problems with 
> straightforward and low-dimensional basic distributions, or discrete 
> problems/distributions. I do not see how it can be used to solve even 
> standard textbook examples in "real" bayesian data analysis. Otherwise, I'd 
> use/improve Anglican, although its GPL license is a bit of a showstopper.
>
> I would loved to have been able to see how far Anglican can go 
> performance-wise, and stretch it to its limits, though. However, it wasn't 
> obvious how to construct any of more serious data analysis problems. Having 
> seen its implementation, I expect the performance comparison would make 
> Bayadera shine, so I hope I'll be able to construct some examples that can 
> be implemented in both environments :)
>
> On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 3:47:50 PM UTC+2, Boris V. Schmid wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dragan.
>>
>> Interesting slides, and interesting section on Bayadera.  Incanter, as 
>> far as I know indeed doesn't support MCMC, but there is a fairly large 
>> project based on clojure that does a lot of bayesian inference.
>>
>> Just in case you haven't run into it:
>> http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~fwood/anglican/examples/index.html
>>
>> (for the far future, there are some interesting developments happening 
>> with approximate bayesian inference using neural network classification to 
>> speed things up. Fun stuff.)
>>
>> On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 11:38:25 PM UTC+2, Dragan Djuric wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, I posted slides for my upcoming EuroClojure talk, so you can 
>>> enjoy the talk without having to take notes: 
>>> http://dragan.rocks/articles/16/Clojure-is-not-afraid-of-the-GPU-slides-EuroClojure
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to