I'm starting to dive into clojure.spec, which is a strong motivation for me to finally appreciate and use namespaced keywords -- an aspect of Clojure that I've ignored until now.
I don't have a good sense of style re how to namespace keywords, especially in standalone projects. I'm inclined to either create a separate namespace for each abstraction (approximately corresponding to each class in an OOP view of my data) or to jam all my keywords into one namespace (corresponding to the fact that I own all of them). Neither approach feels completely right; the first seems much cleaner, but can quickly become very verbose. Can anyone point me to some tasteful code or style guide that discusses the interplay of spec and namespaced keywords? The existing examples seem to be a bit ad hoc. For example, http://clojure.org/guides/spec shows: > (s/def ::date inst?) (s/def ::suit #{:club :diamond :heart :spade}) Which implies defining dates, a generally useful concept, in a local namespace along with parts of a card game. I hope/assume this is just temporary, and clojure.core will soon evolve specs for types like dates, right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
