On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Mikera <mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dragan, > > We have things working quite well (including stuff like cuDNN integration > for convolution networks on the GPU). We also have all of the standard > stuff (many different layer types, dropout, noise function, regularisation > etc.). However I think it still needs a bunch of work before we stabilise > on the core API. > > Things I'm paricularly keen to have nailed down in particular before we go > public: > FWIW it sounds like you've achieved a huge amount already. There are many people in the Clojure community who can come up with a DAG abstraction. There are very, very few who have the skill and time to assess and integrate the various native libs necessary to achieve the fundamental operations in a clojure-friendly way. If people build on the 'wrong' api, thats a good problem to have. The field is so in flux anyway. The problem can also be mitigated through minimalism in what is released in the beginning. In any case, looking forward to hopefully seeing this stuff one day. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
