On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 2:57:52 PM UTC-8, William la Forge wrote:
Interesting. The log4j-api is not needed. log4j-slf4j-impl directly
interfaces with log4j-core.
I would be interested in this too, it looks like async loggers are way
faster, and a factory for Log4j2 would be neat to add without passing by
the SLF4J bridge.
My current setup:
[org.clojure/tools.logging "0.3.1"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-api "2.6.2" :scope
"runtime"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-core "2.6.2" :scope
"runtime"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-jcl "2.6.2" :scope
"runtime"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-jul "2.6.2" :scope
"runtime"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-1.2-api "2.6.2"
:scope "runtime"]
[org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-slf4j-impl "2.6.2"
:scope "runtime"]
But I see there is not too much demand apparently :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
