Thanks everyone--I'm very much appreciating the discussion, though I'm not sure I follow every point.
Dragan, thank you very much for suggesting (and writing) foldmap. Very nice. I certainly don't mind using a library, though I still think there ought to be something like what I've described in the language core. Francis, thanks for separating out the different types of intermediate collections. I'm not entirely clear on type 1. It sounds like those are just collections that are already there before processing them. Or are you saying that Clojure has to convert them to a seq as such? Why would doseq have to do that, for example? It's an understatement to say that my understanding of monads, monoids, etc. is weak. Haven't used Haskell in years, and I never understood monads, etc.. They seem trivial or/and or deeply mysterious. One day I'll have to sit down and figure it out. For foldmap, I don't understand what the first function argument to foldmap is supposed to do, but it's easy enough to put something there that does nothing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
