Functions like map/filter/remove are not "collection functions" but rather 
"sequence functions." The collection functions like conj preserve the type 
of their argument. Sequence functions, by contrast, coerce any argument to 
a sequence, and always return a sequence.

Since Clojure 1.7, transducers provide a convenient way to compose 
sequence-like operations but produce a non-sequence as a result:

user=> (into [] (comp (map inc) (filter even?)) [1 2 3 4 5])
[2 4 6]

mapv and filterv were convenience functions added before the introduction 
of transducers, as I recall.
–S




On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 6:23:37 AM UTC-4, Colin Yates wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> So in the spirit of exposing my ignorance to the internet :-), I have just 
> been bitten by a bug due to the behaviour of the core libraries which I 
> find really surprising:
>
> (def v [1 2 3])
> (conj v 4) => [1 2 3 4]
> (conj (map identity v) 4) => (4 1 2 3)
> (conj (remove (constantly false) v) 4) => (4 1 2 3)
> (conj (filter identity v) 4) => (4 1 2 3)
>
> In other words, I was relying on map, remove and filter preserving the 
> semantics (other than laziness) of the structure of the input, give it a 
> vector and you get a vector-like lazy sequence. This turns out not to be 
> the case.
>
> Now, I know there is mapv which returns a vector but why isn't there a 
> removev and a filterv etc.?
>
> What makes it more onerous for me is the fact conj states that its 
> behaviour differs depending on the concrete type, which is great, but how 
> am I supposed to know which concrete type is returned from 
> map|filter|remove? My assumption was it would be semantically equivalent to 
> the input (i.e. a vector in this case).
>
> The reason I have dodged this is because I don't frequently rely on vector 
> semantics but I am surprised this isn't better documented?
>
> Is it me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colin
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to